Movie Review – The Mechanic (2011)


Jason Statham is elite hitman Arthur Bishop in The Mechanic. A professional at his level doesn’t meet directly with the clients: he gets his jobs through a murder-for-hire broker represented by an “executive” baddie, nameless bodyguards, and the voice of an anonymous telephone operator. Bishop’s primary contact is his old mentor and friend Harry McKenna (Donald Sutherland). When the company hires him to kill McKenna over an internecine dispute, he does so without hesitation. Bishop has always lived and worked alone, but his solitude is broken when he agrees to tutor McKenna’s son Steve (Ben Foster)- violent, aimless, sometime drug-user- in the assassin’s trade.

The Mechanic is a remake of the 1972 film of the same title starring Charles Bronson. Although the new film hews fairly closely to the plot of the original, the characterization and overall storytelling emphasis are significantly different. Essentially, the material has been re-worked as an action movie vehicle for Statham. The action quotient is majorly ramped up and the drama and suspense have been correspondingly ratcheted down.

By way of illustration: In an early scene, Bishop meets McKenna to collect payment for a job. A bit of clunky exposition has McKenna tell Bishop that he’s as good as he is at what he does because he can read people, because he sees things other people don’t see. However, our takeaway from seeing him in action is that he’s the best at what he does because he’s physically very strong and mentally, is able to kill without compunction. Likewise Steve’s training is mostly concentrated on weapons practice at Bishop’s backwoods firing range.

This is a fast-paced, action-heavy movie about amoral men. The action itself is choreographed and filmed with a brutal efficiency that keeps things moving, and also shows Bishop as a relentless, ruthless killer. The film’s overall visual aesthetic is, appropriately enough given the content and source material, in the neo-exploitation style currently in vogue for low-to-modest budget Hollywood actioners.

Viewers looking beyond the action will find that the film’s greatest virtues are Foster’s twitchy, hollow-eyed performance as the rage-fueled Steve and the underlying ambiguity of Bishop’s motives and actions where his disciple-victim is concerned. Foster is good right up through his note-perfect final scene, but the filmmaking badly undercuts the ambiguity at the dramatic climax. The last scene boils down to a set-it-up-for-a-sequel cheap shot at the audience’s expense. A movie filled with ugly violence committed by sociopaths should have the guts to be tough-minded.

2 stars


Possibly Related Posts: (Commentary Track generated)

Review of The Mechanic (1972)

4 responses to “Movie Review – The Mechanic (2011)

  1. If I understand what you mean by ‘neo-Exploitation’, I think I might call if faux-exploitation instead. This one seems like a by-the-numbers effort topped by a craven surrender to test audience complaints -“but, what happened?” – to the original ending . I did think Foster made more than could have been expected from his character. I wish the film makers had been tough-minded enough to end the movie with his last scene. One assumes this movie was directed at young men, not middle-aged women such as myself. Can’t they take their amoral witless violence straight?

    • “I wish the film makers had been tough-minded enough to end the movie with his [Steve’s] last scene.”

      That’s it exactly. The film is built around a protagonist who can kill his oldest, best and only friend for money- without flinching. Yet, the movie still wants us to like him, or at least, to admire him and be rooting for him to prevail in the end. (It’s a done to death cliche: the noble killer living by a code, suffering an unacknowledged yearning for some amorphous more to life, he only kills bad men, etc.) The characters/plot/unremitting brutality scream for a harsh finish. I could have forgiven many of the film’s other flaws if it hadn’t wimped out in the end.

  2. The original was a powerful film for its time, filled with ambiguities that built tension until the final scene. Bad as the boring sequel-setup is in the final scene of the remake, it is better screenwriting than an earlier scene where a key piece of evidence is clumsily and unnecessarily revealed to both a character and the audience.

  3. Man, I keep hearing that the ending to this remake has been changed and that EVERYBODY IN THE WORLD hates it. I’m now afraid to watch the movie, I mean, come one! How can you change the ending?! You already changed the Steve character completely! *sigh*

    I’ll wait for the DVD to find out what the giant twist is.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s