Movie Review – No Country for Old Men (2007)

by NIR SHALEV

There’s this boy I sent to the electric chair at Huntsville here a while back. My arrest and my testimony. He killed a 14 year old girl. Papers said it was a crime of passion, but he told me there wasn’t any passion to it. Told me he’d planned to kill somebody for as long as he could remember. Said if they turned him out he’d do it again. Said he knew he was going to hell. Be there in about 15 minutes. I don’t know what to make of that. I sure do don’t.

That’s part of a speech heard in the film’s opening voiceover narration, spoken by the tired sheriff of a Texas-Mexico border town, Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (Tommy Lee Jones). The sheriff believes that in his line of work one must always be prepared to put his life on the line, but he doesn’t want to confront whatever it is he cannot comprehend. That’s his philosophy, a sound lesson, and he can be interpreted as the film’s protagonist.

No Country for Old Men is the story of a simple man, Llewellyn Moss (Josh Brolin), who stumbles upon a drug deal gone bad. He finds the blood money belonging to dead men from two rival factions in the middle of the desert and decides to keep it for himself.

Enter Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem, who won an Oscar for this performance), an assassin hired to retrieve the money. Chigurh sports a mushroom haircut and wears black clothes; he is tall and pale, and sometimes lets out a creepy smile. His is a personality that one cannot comprehend, for Chigurh is literally evil incarnate. When he speaks he does so without suggestion, always meaning exactly what he says and he carries with him a very unusual weapon, a makeshift cattle prod: a hose is connected to a canister of compressed air on one end and on the other end is a metal piece that protrudes a 6 inch spike and then retracts it. It is normally used on cattle but Chigurh uses it on fellow human beings.

Chigurh is a murderer who is methodical but his actions are not predetermined, therefore Chigurh is not a psychopath but a compulsive killer. At the start of the film, while choking a cop with his own handcuffs and slitting the cop’s throat in the process, he showcases an emotion like that of sexual gratification; he is wide-eyed and ecstatic. He then walks over to the bathroom and washes his hands and bloodied wrists. It’s brutal in nature and tough to watch but we take note that Chigurh is basically a homicidal fetishist.

Llewellyn, Chigurh, and the sheriff never meet throughout the entirety of the film. Llewellyn comes across Chigurh a couple of times in exquisitely shot, extremely tense, lightning quick shoot-outs but never actually sees him in person because in both instances he’s fleeing for his life; that and the directors never show the attacker. The sheriff wants to find Llewellyn and to protect him from Chigurh and the three are always on a merry chase throughout.

This is the first film in which the Coen Brothers use the film technique of realism. The scenes with the shootings are bloody and somewhat realistically gory and the film has no musical soundtrack at all, which allows us to immerse ourselves in its atmosphere and to insert own subconscious to the atmosphere and situations; in short we feel like we’re there with Llewellyn, Chigurh, and the sheriff. The feeling of hopelessness grows deeper within us because the Coens use constant shots of barren, searing landscapes.

If Llewellyn had been city born and bred and had come across the money in a city like Austin or New York, then this film would be a much more action packed and brainless film. What this film offers is a huge visual metaphor of hopelessness in the face of an unstoppable force and Llewellyn tries to become an immovable object, but he is a mortal man and Chigurh is the personification of evil.

The moral is simple: know what you’re doing or whom you’re dealing with. If one sees a shotgun around the corner then it’s best to keep one’s distance from the gun and if one sees a rifle then it’s best to stay completely out of sight. Llewellyn tries to hide from Chigurh and outrun him but he is never able to kill him. The best advice that Llewellyn should follow would be to avoid a fight or a war altogether; heck, he could simply give up the money. But it’s not in his nature to do so and when Chigurh is metaphorically described to the audience we understand that Llewellyn will grow into a tragic figure. And the sheriff always tries to protect Llewellyn instead of fighting against Chigurh because he’s the wisest of them all.

For Josh Brolin and Javier Bardem the performances are career defining. The actors embody their characters in a “realistic” manner, that is to say not in the traditional theatrical sense. We know that we are watching a film but we feel that we are watching people and not actors. And Tommy Lee Jones can never give a bad performance.

The shot compositions are terrific and the Coens are the types of directors that don’t waste a single shot. Every shot in the film is meaningful and the film can be studied shot by shot to verify my claim. I should know because I have an excellent comprehension of shot compositions and because I’d watched this film several times since its initial theatrical release.

This is a perfect movie in every aspect. The performances are excellent, the direction and cinematography are masterful, and the editing and the use of sound effects, and lack of music raises the hairs at the back of one’s neck. It’s also an excellent exercise in shooting a film with a moderate budget. Fargo (1996) is also a perfect film but was only the beginning for the Coens. No Country for Old Men is a longer, bigger, meaner, and deeper philosophical masterpiece and is therefore, easily one of the best movies of the past decade.

**********

Possibly Related Posts: (Commentary Track generated)

This review was published in conjunction with the Commentary Track “Best of the 2000s” series.

Best of the Decade – 2007
Best of the Decade – Project Introduction

2 responses to “Movie Review – No Country for Old Men (2007)

  1. There be spoilers in this comment:

    Chigur’s complexity is a part of the film which I appreciated. The Coen’s wrote him as a figure which blamed his own actions on fate, and the flip of the coin. The character refuses to take responsibility for his own actions.

    I think that’s one of the main morals of the show as well. You can’t blame fate for your decisions, you create your own personal hell. Llewllyn’s wife is the only one who recognized this fact, yet even she got killed by Chigur. At least it was an honorable death.

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s